Tigress on the Prowl
Avni, perhaps had migrated to Ralegaon area and Pandharkawada from Tipeshwer wildlife sanctuary 50-60km west of Loni village in Yavatmal district. Her first kill was believed to be a woman named Sonabai Ghosale in village Borati, in 2016. The conflict escalated in August 2018, when in a single month, three victims were linked to Avni’s fury . By then, an order was issued to kill the tigress, which was immediately challenged in the High Court and later in the Supreme Court. Based on photographic evidence and track marks, authorities linked the animal to 13 deaths. There were protests in the region as villagers wanted the tigress to be killed. But people also alleged the involvement of politicians in instigating the villagers.
Also read : Another tiger loses life in eco-sensitive rail zone connecting India
On the other hand conservationists in Maharashtra also protested against the government's order to kill the tigress. Those who follow the wildlife stories in India know that Avni’s case generated a huge controversy. In January 2020, nearly 13 months after her killing, the case was reopened again by the new Uddhav Thackeray government in Maharashtra following a letter by animal conservationist Jerryl Banait, a young dermatologist based in Nagpur. He said that much before the tiger was eliminated, he had named her after his father’s name who is also a practicing doctor in Nagpur. After Avni’s death, he filed a criminal PIL. He said that he would continue to pursue the case till Avni gets justice. Several pleas were filed in the SC. And as he pursues the cases, his life is at risk. There is another activist ,Sangeeta Dogra who made two claims. The first was that Avani was not a man-eater since human remains were not found to be part of the contents of her stomach post-mortem. The second claim is that following the killing, the shooter Ali was gifted a silver tigress for the act by the villagers, essentially making it an act of trophy killing.
The Hunt for Avni
Also read: Protect This Wildlife Corridor To Save The Ganges
The tigress was shot by Asghar Ali Khan, a shooter from Hyderabad hired by the forest department to eliminate the tigress . One night, Asgar Ali Khan and his team were informed about the sighting of T1."After hearing reports of the tiger being on the road we moved in to ensure safe passage of any people and to get them out, and also in the hope of tranquilising her," The Telegraph quoted Khan ."Our priority was always to capture the tigress, but my team was in extreme danger when she charged us, so I had to shoot. I just picked up my .458 Winchester Magnum rifle and fired. I didn't even have time to aim,"he said. "There was no doubt that human lives were in danger. There was a market day and the tiger was just on a road that people use and children cycle on so we had to get there," Asgar Ali Khan, the hunter who killed the animal, told the Telegraph. "She had tasted human flesh and saw us like monkeys, or goats, or other prey. So when she charged at us I had to shoot in self-defence."
The real Issue
The Avni saga yet again puts the focus on the fragmented forests of the country in general and those of eastern Maharashtra's in particular. And no one in India seems to be willing to address the issue. But the mandarin of the Ministry of Environment and Forest continue to be in denial mode as they refuse to address the issue. They also need to be addressed with a strong political will. Imagine 35 % of India’s tiger population or about 1000 in number roam about outside the reserve forest areas. The latest tiger census said there were 2967 found in India. For years, India’s conservation approach has singularly focused on protected areas, which constitute a mere 5% of India’s landmass ignoring the forest corridors . There are villages, roads and farms disconnecting them with the reserved forests.
Also read:Tiger's Epic Walk Raises Serious Environmental Issues
Like other parts of India, Maharashtra’s large carnivores also share space with dense human populations in many pockets, highlighting the need to shift the focus from a protected-area centric approach to a landscape-level conservation policy . Two processes are at play, explains a senior IFS officer of Maharashtra. “The tigers are growing and forests are fragmenting. Conflict is a natural corollary, ”he said .The tiger habitats, he said , have shrunk and their corridors of movement have been broken. There are more tigers outside protected areas today than there were a few years ago, he points out. In Yavatmal, the problem, however, did not start with T1, nor will it end with her demise, say wildlife activists. “This is the right time to sit down and redraft our conservation strategy," Nitin Desai, the central India director of the Wildlife Protection Society of India (WPSI) has been quoted in the media. “We have to deal with a tiger population that has not seen or won’t see a contiguous forest belt. We are essentially looking at wild cats hovering around us", he observed.
Comments
Post a Comment